Aspects of future transport: long term maglev strategies instead of conventional rail concepts?

Cover Page

Abstract


Aspects of future transport: long term maglev strategies instead of conventional rail concepts?


Full Text

The idea of considering Maglev systems challenges established ways of thinking on how to deal with an increasing transport demand. Today, the railway industry seems focused on traditional business models that profit from friction, wear and tear  of established conventional transport systems. It is Maglev Systems that have begun  to challenge those traditional business concepts. Maglev is a fundamentally different concept of transport – which might explain the reluctance, even ignorance, which Maglev systems continue to face.

The less competition in the market, the more attractive it appears in the short term for manufacturers to postpone a technological innovation like Maglev and to secure current sources of income through long-term maintenance contracts (delivery, spare parts) that are linked to conventional wheel/rail contracts. Such an orientation  on the commercially lucrative (rather than on the system-technologically superior) can strongly handicap, delay or even stop transportation technological innovations.

As the lifetime of high-speed rail/wheel infrastructures comes to an end, the technology question will arise again. Based on the operation experiences with highspeed-trains, the technology question is likely to arise significantly earlier than generally expected. The question then will be whether in restoring or maintaining Trans-European high-speed routes (Eastern Europe, UK) the conventional wheel/rail technology continues to be used or whether such corridors should better be based on high-speed Maglev technology.

Worldwide, there are currently only very few corridors left, for which interurban high-speed Maglev transport is potentially qualified or might appear meaningful. But for such new corridor routes, for example such as:

  • the Brazilian Rio de Janeiro Sao Paulo corridor;
  • the corridor Hamburg – Berlin – Warsaw/Baltic States – Petersburg – Moscow;
  • the Pan-European corridor IV (Berlin – Prague – Vienna – Budapest);
  • the Washington – Baltimore corridor (USA) or even;
  • the UK corridor (London – Liverpool; Glasgow, Edinburgh),

a detailed, fair technology comparison and examination should be made with regard  to high-speed Maglev.

Japan already leapfrogs to high speed Maglev systems. Russia strives for Cargo Maglev strategies. China and Korea boost the implementation of Urban Maglev technologies. Transrapid Maglev technology is being further developed by

Chinese Universities. And Germany has begun to build elevators based on Maglev technology.....

Sooner or later, a paradigm shift in transport in favour of Maglev seems likely.

About the authors

Johannes Kluehspies

The International Maglev Board

Author for correspondence.
Email: jok.geo@t-online.de

Germany, Munich

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 449

PDF (English) - 157

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions

Comments on this article

Comments on this article

View all comments

Copyright (c) 2016 Kluehspies J.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies