## Levitation Characteristics of a Transport Installation with an Electrodynamic Suspension During a Longitudinal Joint with Road Track

**Authors:**Voevodskii K.E.^{1}, Strepetov V.M.^{2}, Sereda G.E.^{2}**Affiliations:**- St. Petersburg State University
- Emperor Alexander I Petersburg State Transport University

**Issue:**Vol 5, No 2 (2019)**Pages:**70-82**Section:**Original papers**URL:**https://transsyst.ru/transsyst/article/view/15177**DOI:**https://doi.org/10.17816/transsyst20195270-82- Cite item

# Abstract

**Aim:** to propose a technical solution to ensure the lateral stabilization of the vehicle with an electrodynamic suspension. Development of a method for calculating the levitation characteristics of a transport installation with an electrodynamic suspension in the presence of a longitudinal joint in the track. Analysis of the results of theoretical studies.

**М****aterials and methods:** The article used the methods of the electromagnetic field theory, generalized functions, Fourier transform, analytical and numerical methods for determining quadratures. The program for PC was developed in the Fortran language.

**Result:** to ensure lateral stabilization of the vehicle with an electrodynamic suspension, it was proposed to introduce a longitudinal insulating joint into the structure of the track bed. A mathematical model is proposed for this system of electrodynamic suspension in approximation of an infinitely wide track structure of rectangular cross section.

A mathematical model is proposed for this system of electrodynamic suspension in approximation of an infinitely wide track structure of rectangular cross section. Numerical integration of these equations was performed by applying the Gauss formula and the Philo method. The results of the calculations allowed us to obtain a number of graphical dependencies of the levitation characteristics on the magnitude of the lateral displacement of the carriage electromagnet from a relatively symmetrical position.

**Conclusion:** thus, the obtained results of the study fully meet the goal of determining the parameters of the side stabilization of the vehicle with an electrodynamic suspension with a track, containing a longitudinal joint under the assumptions made.

Comparison of the proposed method with other proposed stabilization methods does not reveal the decisive advantages or disadvantages of the new method. In most cases, its most serious drawback is its low levitation quality. However, it is significantly reduced if the movement of the high speed ground transportation vehicle occurs predominantly at high speed, at which the force of aerodynamic drag prevails over the force of electrodynamic braking.

Same relative is and the dignity of the system-high lateral rigidity. The reason for this is that the demands on the lateral stiffness can be quantified only formulated in relation to a particular track HSGT taking into account the timetable and other factors.

In fact, the main destabilizing influences in sideways are inertia at motion on component and crosswind. Its role in choosing the stabilization system could play and other tasks the system subsystems HSGT.

For example, installing additional stabilizing magnets can make it difficult to escape the passenger compartment from the magnetic field. Plays a role also principle and system design of traction. From the above it is clear that the final choice of the lateral stabilization of the research at this stage would be premature.

Proposed and studied in this article a new way to stabilize should be regarded as another possible along with the preceding. The answer to the question on the competitiveness of the new method must be bound to the characteristics of specific trails HSGT. Necessary and further refinement of results associated with the more strict account of edge effect, as well as consideration of the case of uninsulated interface.

# Full Text

## INTRODUCTION

For a majority of industrial developed countries consistent passenger transit growth is inherent, which can be ensured through increase of capacity and throughput of transport systems. At the same time, transport services quality is supposed to be enhanced: reduction of time costs of door-to-door delivery, reduction of rolling stock occupancy rate in rush hours, and shortening of headways.

One of the alternative answers to this challenge is construction of high-speed ground transport systems (HGTS) using magnetic suspension. Construction of magnetic suspension HGTS fosters economic growth through implementation of cutting edge results of technical and scientific progress, and encourages strengthening of Russia’s prestige as one of the leading countries with highly-developed transport systems [1–5].

Two types of magnetic suspension are primarily used – electromagnetic (EMS) and electrodynamic (EDS) suspensions.

EDS system is based on repulsive forces, emerging between magnetic field of superconducting DC electromagnets onboard of the vehicle and currents induced by them in a continuous or discrete type of guideway. In comparison to EMS, EDS provides a larger suspension height (100–200 mm). EDS inherently has a natural vertical stability.

There are many ways to achieve lateral stabilisation of EDS transport systems’ vehicles. However, each of them has its own certain disadvantages. In this regard, it is relevant to find an alternative method for the lateral stabilisation of the vehicle of this transport system.

The aim of this work is to obtain theoretical and technical solutions that ensure achievement of this aim.

## MAIN DEFINITIONS AND TASK SETTING

The design of EDS system, the guideway of which has a longitudinal joint, is presented in Fig. 1.

**Fig.1. Design of EDS transport system having longitudinal joint in the guideway**

Fig. 1 shows: 1 – guideway, 2 – longitudinal joint in the guideway, 3 – suspension electromagnet.

The calculation scheme for levitation characteristics of transport unit with EDS system having a longitudinal joint is given in Fig. 2.

Let us proceed from the assumption that the presence of the longitudinal joint in the guideway will provide stability lateral stability to EDS.

To substantiate this assumption, let us limit ourselves to the approximation of an infinitely wide guideway.

We will assume that the guideway is a layer between the planes z = 0 and z =*T* (*T* – thickness of the guideway), the air gap in the guideway occupies the area -*a* <*y* <*a* (thus, the width of the air gap is 2*a*), the vehicle onboard electromagnet moves along the axis *x* in the plane *z* = *h*>*T*.

In [6] *the method of assumed boundary* is suggested that enables bringing the task of calculation of electromagnetic field in the described system to calculation of the fields excited in the plane layer 0 ≤ z ≤ *T*, fully filled with non-homogeneous conductive medium. For this case the specific conductivity of the medium in this layer depends only on the coordinate *y*, and this dependence has the form of (1):

$\sigma \left(y\right)={\sigma}_{0}k\left(y\right)$, $k=\left\{\begin{array}{l}1\text{\hspace{0.33em}}\u043f\u0440\u0438\text{\hspace{0.33em}}\left|y>a\right|\\ 0\text{\hspace{0.33em}}\u043f\u0440\u0438\text{\hspace{0.33em}}\left|y<a\right|\end{array}\right.$. (1)

Here, σ_{0} – specific conductivity of the guideway material.

The calculation diagram for determination of levitation properties of the transport unit with EDS having a longitudinal joint in the guideway is given in Fig. 2.

**Fig. 2. Calculated diagram of EDS transport system with a longitudinal joint in the guideway**

The problem of calculation of fields in the non-homogeneous conducting layer, the specific conductivity of which can depend on all three coordinates, is considered in [7], where the basic integral equation of the EDL theory is obtained, in which the role of the unknown function is played by the Fourier-image of the vector of electrical field strength ** E** in the layer 0 ≤ z ≤ T.

In [8] the specific case (transverse joint) is covered in detail, when the specific conductivity depends only on the coordinate *x, *and this dependence has the form (1) with *y *replaced by *x*. It is shown that with real values of parameters of the system, the approximation of the thin guideway (skin layer thickness is larger than that of the guideway) is applicable, and in this approximation one dimensional integral equation for Fourier image of *x-*component of the vector ** E** has been obtained.

Repeating these considerations as applied to the longitudinal joint, we can obtain the following integral equation of the Fourier-image of *y-*component of the vector ** E**.

$u\left(y\right)=\u0424\left(y\right)+\frac{i\xi}{\pi r}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\underset{}{\overset{}{\int}}u\left({y}^{\text{'}}\right)\left[{K}_{0}(\left|\xi (y-{y}^{\text{'}})\right|\right.)-H(y\left){K}_{0}\right(\left|\xi ({y}^{\text{'}}-a)\right|)\left.-H(-y){K}_{0}\left(\left|\xi ({y}^{\text{'}}+a)\right|\right)\right]\text{\hspace{0.33em}}d{y}^{\text{'}}$. (2)

Here, *u*(*y*) – the Fourier-image *E _{y}* by the variable

*x*; ξ, η – Fourier transform parameters by variables

*x*и

*y*; $k=\xi \text{\hspace{0.17em}}{e}_{x}+\eta {e}_{y}$, $k=\left|k\right|=\sqrt{{\xi}^{2}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}+{\eta}^{2}}$;

$\u0424\left(y\right)=f\left(y\right)-H\left(y\right)f\left(a\right)-H(-y)f(-a)$; *f* (*y*) – the Fourier inversion of the function $f\left(\eta \right)=({\mu}_{0}/2k)v{\xi}^{2}V(k)\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{e}^{-kh}$; $r=2/l$; $l={\mu}_{0}{\sigma}_{0}vT$; $v$ – vehicle velocity, *V*(*k*) – the Fourier-image by *x* and *y* of potential current function, characterising the form and force of the vehicle electromagnet [9];

$H\left(y\right)=\left\{\begin{array}{l}{e}^{-\left|\xi y\right|}/\left(2\text{ch(}\xi a\right)\text{\hspace{1em}}y>a\\ 0\text{\hspace{1em}\hspace{1em}\hspace{1em}\hspace{1em}\hspace{1em}\hspace{1em}}y<-a\end{array}\right.$; *К*_{0} – modified Hankel function of the zero order [10]. While obtaining this equation, the data in [11] were also used.

## LEVITATION HARACTERISTICS CALCULATION

Let us limit ourselves to the case when the width of the air gap 2*a* is smaller as compared to other typical sizes of the system. In this case, the influence of the joint is mainly connected not with absence of the conductive medium in the air gap |*y*| < *a*, but with distortion of the eddy current picture in the guideway, which is caused by the absence of electrical contact between the areas *y>** a* and *y<**-a*. For this reason, the equation (2) can be replaced by its ultimate case with *a** →*0, i.e. by equation:

$u\left(y\right)=f\left(y\right)-f\left(0\right)\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{e}^{-\left|\xi ,y\right|}+\frac{i\xi}{\pi r}\left[\underset{-\infty}{\overset{\infty}{\int}}{K}_{0}\left(\left|\xi (y-{y}^{\text{'}})\right|\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\right)u\left({y}^{\text{'}}\right)-{e}^{-\left|\xi ,y\right|}\underset{-\infty}{\overset{\infty}{\int}}{K}_{0}\left(\left|\xi \text{\hspace{0.17em}}y\right|\right)\text{\hspace{0.17em}}u\left(y\right)\text{\hspace{0.17em}}dy\right]$ (3)

The equation (3) is solved in quadrature. For this purpose, it is convenient to make in the equation (3) Fourier transform by variable *y. *The first integral in the formula (3) is the convolution by variable *y, *and the second - the scalar multiplication in the space *L*_{2}*(-∞<y<∞) *of the functions *K*_{0}**(**|ξ*y*|) and *u*(*y*), therefore as the result of Fourier transform they will consequently turn to multiplication and scalar multiplication in *L*_{2}(-∞<η<∞) of the Fourier-images of the given functions. Expressing the value *f *(0) through the Fourier-image of the function *f* and using data [11], the following equation can be obtained from (3)

$u\left(\eta \right)=f\left(\eta \right)-\frac{\left|\xi \right|}{\pi {k}^{2}}\underset{-\infty}{\overset{\infty}{\int}}f\left(\eta \right)\text{\hspace{0.17em}}d\eta +\frac{i\xi}{r}\left[\frac{u\left(\xi \right)}{k}-\frac{\left|\xi \right|}{\pi {k}^{2}}\underset{-\infty}{\overset{\infty}{\int}}\frac{u\left(\eta \right)}{k}\right]$ .

Having separated *u *here, which stands outside the integral, we come to integral equation with degenerate kernel, which is solved with standard method [12, 13, 14], and the solution of which has the form

$u\left(\eta \right)=\frac{r}{kr-i\xi}\left[kf\left(\eta \right)-\frac{\gamma \left|\xi \right|{\displaystyle \underset{-\infty}{\overset{\infty}{\int}}kf\left(\eta \right)/(kr-i\xi )d\eta}}{k(\pi +i\text{\hspace{0.17em}sign(}\xi \text{)\hspace{0.17em}ln(}\lambda +\text{1)/(}\gamma \text{-1)}}\right]$; $\gamma =\sqrt{{r}^{2}+1}.$ (4)

Let us reiterate that the *u* function is the *y*-component of the sought vector ** E**. Knowing it, we can find all the vector components. Its

*x*-component is defined by the following expressions

**and**

*E***[8]. Then, using the approach [9], in the similar manner as it was done in [8], we can find the force acting on the vehicle electromagnet.**

*B*Omitting the intermediate conclusions, we give the resulting formulas, determining this force

$F={F}_{\text{0}}+f$; ${F}_{\text{0}}=4{\mu}_{0}l\left(\frac{l}{2}{e}_{\text{z}}-{e}_{x}\right)\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\underset{0}{\overset{\infty}{\int}}d\xi \underset{0}{\overset{\infty}{\int}}d\eta \frac{{k}^{2}{\xi}^{2}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{e}^{-2kh}{\left|V\left(k\right)\right|}^{2}}{4{k}^{2}-{i}^{2}{\xi}^{2}}$, (5)

$f=\frac{{\mu}_{\text{0}}\gamma}{2}\underset{-\infty}{\overset{\infty}{\int}}d\xi \frac{{\xi}^{2}}{i\pi \text{\hspace{0.17em}sign(}\xi \text{)}+\text{ln}\frac{\gamma +\text{1}}{\gamma \text{-1}}}\left\{\underset{-\infty}{\overset{\infty}{\int}}d{\eta}_{1}{G}_{1}^{-}\frac{{e}^{-{k}_{1}h}V\left({k}_{1}\right)}{{k}_{\text{1}}r-i\xi}\underset{-\infty}{\overset{\infty}{\int}}d{\eta}_{2}\frac{{e}^{-{k}_{2}h}V\left({k}_{2}\right)}{{k}_{\text{2}}r-i\xi}\right\}$ (6)

${k}_{\mathrm{1,2}}=\xi \text{\hspace{0.17em}}{e}_{x}+{\eta}_{\mathrm{1,2}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{e}_{y}$; ${k}_{\text{1,2}}=\left|{k}_{\text{1,2}}\right|$; ${\overrightarrow{G}}_{1}^{-}=i\xi \text{\hspace{0.17em}}{e}_{x}+{\eta}_{1}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{e}_{y}-{k}_{1}{e}_{z}$.

Let's specify the received relations with reference to a case of the rectangular form of a vehicle electromagnet with a length 2*а* and width 2*b*. Its lateral displacement relative to the plane *y* = 0 will be indicated by Δ (see Fig. 2). For the described case

$V\left(k\right)=\frac{2I}{\pi}\frac{\mathrm{sin}a\xi \cdot \mathrm{sin}b\eta}{\eta \xi}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{e}^{-i\eta \Delta}$.

Putting it into the equation in (6), we can obtain after a number of elementary transformations

$\left\{\begin{array}{l}{f}_{x}=C\underset{0}{\overset{\infty}{\int}}\xi {\mathrm{sin}}^{2}\left(a\xi \right)\mathrm{Im}\left(\alpha {I}_{1}\right)\text{\hspace{0.17em}}d\xi ;\text{\hspace{0.33em}\hspace{0.33em}}{f}_{y}=C\underset{0}{\overset{\infty}{\int}}\xi {\mathrm{sin}}^{2}\left(a\xi \right)\mathrm{Re}\left(\alpha {I}_{1}{I}_{2}\right)\text{\hspace{0.17em}}d\xi ;\\ {f}_{z}=C\underset{0}{\overset{\infty}{\int}}{\mathrm{sin}}^{2}\left(a\xi \right)\mathrm{Re}\left(\alpha {I}_{1}{I}_{3}\right)\text{\hspace{0.17em}}d\xi ;\text{\hspace{0.33em}\hspace{0.33em}}\partial {f}_{y}/\partial \Delta =C\underset{0}{\overset{\infty}{\int}}{\mathrm{sin}}^{2}\left(a\xi \right)\mathrm{Re}\left(\alpha \right({I}_{1}{I}_{4}-{I}_{2}^{2}\left)\right)\text{\hspace{0.17em}}d\xi .\end{array}\right.$ (7)

Here $\u0421=\frac{16{\mu}_{0}\gamma {I}^{2}}{{\pi}^{2}}$; $\alpha ={\left(\mathrm{ln}\frac{\gamma +1}{\gamma -1}+i\pi \right)}^{-1}$; ${I}_{i}\left(\xi \right)\underset{0}{\overset{\infty}{\int}}\frac{{J}_{i}\left(\xi \right)\mathrm{sin}\left(b\eta \right)}{kr-i\xi}\text{\hspace{0.33em}}{e}^{-kh}\text{\hspace{0.33em}}(i=\mathrm{1,...4})$;

${J}_{1}\left(\eta \right)=\mathrm{cos}\left(\Delta \eta \right)/\eta $; ${J}_{2}\left(\eta \right)=\mathrm{sin}\left(\Delta \eta \right)$;${J}_{3}\left(\eta \right)=k\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{J}_{1}\left(\eta \right)$; ${J}_{4}\left(\eta \right)=\eta \mathrm{cos}\left(\Delta \eta \right)$.

The value ∂*f*_{y}/∂Δ has the sense of lateral rigidity of the suspension, its expression is obtained by differentiation of the formula for *f*_{y}.

Putting the above-given expression for *V (k)* into the formula (5) leads to its cardinal simplification: transiting in the integral (5) to the polar coordinates k, φ (ξ=*k* cosφ, η=*k* sinφ) it is possible to notice that the integral by *k* is calculated analytically, as a result of which the formula for the electrodynamic force ** F_{0}** acquires the following form

${F}_{\text{0}}=\frac{{\mu}_{0}l}{{\pi}^{2}}\left(\frac{l}{2}{e}_{\text{z}}-{e}_{\text{z}}\right)\text{\hspace{0.33em}}\underset{0}{\overset{\pi /2}{\int}}\mathrm{ln}\left\{\frac{{(1+{A}^{2}{\mathrm{cos}}^{2}\varphi )}^{2}{(1+{B}^{2}{\mathrm{sin}}^{2}\varphi )}^{2}}{(1+{(A\mathrm{cos}\varphi +B\mathrm{sin}\varphi )}^{2})(1+{(A\mathrm{cos}\varphi -B\mathrm{sin}\varphi )}^{2})}\right\}\times \frac{d\varphi}{{\mathrm{sin}}^{2}\varphi (4+{l}^{2}{\mathrm{cos}}^{2}\varphi )}$ (8)

Here, А = *a/h*, B = *b/h*.

## NUMERICAL CALCULATION METHOD

To perform certain calculations using the presented formulas, there is one thing left, i.e. to rationally choose the method of numerical integration. The calculation of the integral (8) does not bring about any difficulties. For this, any simple quadrature formula can be used. In fact, the Gauss formula with ten and twenty-four (depending on certain values of the parameters) nodes was used.

The calculation of the integrals, contained in (7), is more complex, due to infinity of the integration interval and fast oscillation of sub-integral function. For calculation of the integrals of this type, it is relevant to use the Philo method [15]. Let us note that in the sub-integral expression for *I*_{1}(ξ) there is a removable peculiarity: sin *b*η, therefore, in calculation of this integral using the Philo method, it is necessary to separate some small area of zero, and the integral for this area should be calculated individually.

## ANALYSIS OF THE CALCULATION RESULTS

The results of the calculations performed are given in Fig. 3, 4. All charts in these figures reflect the dependence of levitation characteristics on the value of lateral displacement of the vehicle electromagnet relatively to the symmetrical position. The value of displacement is set in the relative units Δ/2*b*, where 2*b* **–** the width of the electromagnet. The calculations correspond to the following set of data: suspension height *h *= 22 cm, magnet length 2*а* = 1 m, magnet width 2*b *= 30** **cm, plate width – 5 mm, specific conductivity of material of the guideway σ = 3.4∙10^{7 }(Ω⋅m).

Since the aim of the introduction of the longitudinal joint is in lateral stabilisation of electrodynamic suspension, the lateral, i.e. *y*-component of the levitation force is of greatest interest. The dependence of this component on the displacement value is given in Fig. 3.

**Fig. 3 Dependence of the restoring force on lateral displacement**

**Fig. 4 Dependence of the lateral rigidity on Δ displacement**

As it is seen from this chart, the suspension system with *a longitudinal joint in the guideway has lateral stability* (component *f*_{y} has property of restoring force).

It's about static stability. With small displacements, the dependence *f*_{y} on Δ is close to linear; with increasing displacement the restoring force increases slightly slower than the linear function. Along the *ordinate* axis in Fig. 3 the ratio of lateral force to the vehicle weight per one magnet – *P* is set; this weight is considered equal to the lifting force with zero displacement. The curve in Fig. 4 represents the dependence of lateral rigidity on the displacement Δ. The highest lateral rigidity is when the displacement is zero.

This rigidity is not much greater than 0.08 of the vehicle weight with displacement by one hundredth of the magnet width.

The curves in Fig. 3, 4 have been obtained from the calculations using the above-given formulas, corresponding to the case of infinitely wide guideway. Since in this calculation model the edge destabilising effect did not manifest itself, so we have reasonable grounds to suppose that the edge effect will decrease the value of the restoring force and lateral rigidity. Notwithstanding, EDS with a longitudinal joint will retain stability in lateral direction.

Comparison of the suggested method of lateral stabilisation with other methods leads to the conclusion that any of the known methods of stabilisation leads to:

- sophistication of the suspension design;
- deterioration of other levitation characteristics of EDS.

The stabilisation method considered is not an exception. From the viewpoint of suspension design sophistication, the stabilisation with the help of longitudinal joint has a pronounced advantage over other methods, because the vehicle part of the system does not change at all, the consumption of materials per a unit of track length is the same, and sophistication of the guideway is minimal.

## Conclusion

The expressions (5 and 6-7) completely solve the set aim of determination lateral stabilisation characteristics for EDS vehicle having a longitudinal joint in the guideway with the accepted assumptions.

Comparison with the majority stabilisation methods does not help in identification of decisive advantages or disadvantages of the new method. In most cases, its serious disadvantage is low levitation quality. This disadvantage to great extent loses its meaning, if the movement of HGTS vehicle takes place largely at high speed, in which the force aerodynamic resistance prevails over electrodynamic braking force.

The above-mentioned advantage of the considered system (high lateral rigidity) is condition-bound as well. The reason for that is that lateral rigidity requirements can be quantitatively formulated only as applied to a certain track of HGTS, considering its schedule and other factors. As it is known, the main destabilising impacts in the lateral direction are the force of inertia and lateral wind. The intensity of the former is dependent on the curve of the track and train speed, the latter - whether the train travels in the tunnel, deepening, at ground level or on an elevated track, vehicle shell form, and weather requirements.

The tasks of other HGTS’ subsystems can also play their role in choosing the stabilisation system. The principle of operation and design of the traction system also plays its role. So, if the traction is carried out by means of LSM with vertical windings, the most attractive is the method of stabilisation by means of CSSGT (combined system of stabilisation, guideway, traction) [16]. At the same time, the vertical arrangement of the propulsion electromagnets imposes certain restrictions on the design of the vehicle and eliminates the possibility of using LSM to create an additional lifting force, and the latter could, in particular, mitigate the disadvantages of the method of stabilisation by means of a joint in terms of lifting force and levitation quality.

It is clear from what has been said, that the final choice of the lateral stabilisation system at the current stage of the researches would be premature. The new stabilisation method suggested and studied in this paper should be considered only as another possible together with the earlier proposed one. The answer to the question about the competitiveness of the new method should be related to the characteristics of the particular high-speed ground transport line. Further specification of the results is required considering the edge effect, as well the uninsulated joint case.

# About the authors

### Konstantin E. Voevodskii

St. Petersburg State University
**Author for correspondence.**

Email: kv5832@mail.ru

ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0519-5527

SPIN-code: 2579-7541

Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

Ph.D., assistant professor

### Vladimir M. Strepetov

Emperor Alexander I Petersburg State Transport University
Email: strepetov.vm@mail.ru

ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4072-4519

SPIN-code: 4649-2141

https://www.pgups.ru/sveden/employees/strepetov-vladimir-mikhaylovich

Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

Ph.D., assistant professor

### Gennadiy E. Sereda

Emperor Alexander I Petersburg State Transport University
Email: gennady.sereda@mail.ru

ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0754-6682

SPIN-code: 9682-8744

https://www.pgups.ru/sveden/employees/sereda-gennadiy-evgenevich

Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

Ph.D., assistant professor

# References

- Зайцев А.А., Антонов Ю.Ф. Магнитолевитационная транспортная технология. – М: Физматлит, 2014. – 476 с. [Zaitsev AA, Antonov YuF. Magnitolevitacionnaya transportnaya tekhnologiya. Moscow: Fizmatlit; 2014. 456 p. (In Russ.)]. Доступно по: https://b-ok.org/book/2901328/800f1a/?_ir=1. Ссылка активна на: 03.02.2019.
- Зайцев А.А., Талашкин Г.Н., Соколова Я.В. Транспорт на магнитном подвесе / под редакцией Зайцева А. А. – СПб: ПГУПС, 2010. – 160 с. [Zaitsev AA, Talashkin GN, Sokolova IaV. Transport na magnitnom podvese. Zaicev AA, editor. St. Petersburg: PGUPS; 2010. 160 p. (In Russ.)]
- Зайцев А.А. Контейнерный мост Санкт-Петербург – Москва на основе левитации Труды 2-ой Международной научной конференции «Магнитолевитационные и транспортные системы и технологии. МТСТ’14». Санкт-Петербург, 17–20 июня 2014 года / под ред. проф. Ю. Ф. Антонова, Киров: МЦНИП, 2014. – С. 11–23. [Zaitsev AA. Konteinernii most Sankt-Peterburg – Moskva na osnove levitacii. In: Antonov YuF , editor. Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference “Magnitolevitacionnie transportnie sistemi i tehnologii. MTST’14”. 2014, Jun 17-20; St. Petersburg; 2014. pp. 11-23. (In Russ.)]
- Антонов Ю.Ф., Никитин В.В., Хожаинов А.И. Технология HSST в проектах LINIMO и ROTEM. Труды 2-ой Международной научной конференции «Магнитолевитационные и транспортные системы и технологии. МТСТ’14». Санкт-Петербург, 29–31 октября 2013 года / под ред. проф. Ю. Ф. Антонова. – СПб: Pudra, 2013. – С. 133–137. [Antonov YuF, Nikitin VV, Hojainov AI. Tehnologiya HSST v proektah LINIMO i ROTEM In: Antonov YuF, editor. Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference “Magnitolevitacionnie transportnie sistemi i tehnologii (MTST’13)”. 2014 Jun 17-20; St. Petersburg: Pudra; 2013. pp. 133-137. (In Russ.)]
- Гулин С.А., Никитин В.В., Середа Г.Е. и др. Система электроснабжения собственных нужд высокоскоростных магнитолевитационных экипажей с линейным синхронным тяговым приводом // Транспортные системы и технологии. – 2016. – Т. 2. – № 3. – С. 70–83. [Gulin CA, Nikitin VV, Sereda GE, Sereda EG. Power supply system of own needs of MAGLEV vehicles with linear synchronous traction drive. Transportation Systems and Technology. 2016;2(3):70-83. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.17816/transsyst20162370-83.
- Воеводский К.Э., Стрепетов В.М. Метод условной границы // Транспортные системы и технологии. – 2016. – № 4. – С. 133–144. [Voevodskii KE, Strepetov VM. The method of conditional boundary. Transportation Systems and Technology. 2016;2(3):133-144. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.17816/transsyst201623133-144.
- Воеводский К.Э. Интегральное уравнение для расчета квазистационарного электромагнитного поля в неоднородном проводящем слое // Известия вузов «Электромеханика». – 1990. – № 2. – С. 13–18. [Voevodskii KE. Integralnoe uravnenie dlya rascheta kvazistacionarnogo elektromagnitnogo polya v neodnorodnom provodyaschem sloe. Izvestiya vuzov “Elektromehanika”. 1990;2:13-18. (In Russ.)]
- Воеводский К.Э., Стрепетов В.М. Влияние стыков в путевой структуре на характеристики системы электродинамической левитации // Электричество. – 2017. – № 11. – С. 53–60. [Voevodskii KE, Strepetov VM. The Influence of Joints in the Track Structure on the Electrodynamic Levitation System Performance. Elektrichestvo. 2017; 11:53-60. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.24160/0013-5380-2017-11-53-60.
- Воеводский К.Э., Мелик-Бархударян В.К. О расчете магнитного поля заданной системы токов // Известия Академии наук СССР «Энергетика и транспорт». – 1989. – № 4. – С .166–169. [Voevodskii KE, Melik-barhudaryan BK. Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Power Engineering. 1989;4:166-169. (In Russ.)].
- Фихтенгольц Г.М. Курс дифференциального и интегрального исчисления. В 2 т. Т. 2. – М: Наука, 1966. – 800 с. [Fikhtengol'c GM. Kurs differencial'nogo i integral'nogo ischisleniya. Vol. 2. Moscow: Nauka; 1966. 800 p. (In Russ.)].
- Бейтмен Г., Эрдейи А. Таблицы интегральных преобразований. T.1. – М: Наука, 1969. – 110 c. [Beitmen G, Erdeii A. Tablici integralnih preobrazovanii. Vol. 1. Moscow: Nauka; 1969. 110 p. (In Russ.)].
- Забрейко П.П., Кошелев А.И., Красносельский М.А. и др. Интегральные уравнения. – М: Наука, 1968, 448 с. [Zabreiko PP, Koshelev AI, Krasnoselsky MA, et al. Integralnie uravneniya. Moscow: Nauka; 1968. 448 p. (In Russ.)].
- Краснов М.Л. Интегральные уравнения. Введение в теорию. – М: Наука, 1975. – 302 с. [Krasnov ML. Integralnie uravneniya. Vvedenie v teoriyu. Moscow: Nauka; 1975. 302 p. (In Russ.)].
- Смирнов В.И. Курс высшей математики. Т. IV. – М: Наука, 1974, – С. 339–387. [Smirnov VI. Kurs visshei matematiki. Vol. IV. Moscow: Nauka; 1974. 387 p. (In Russ.)].
- Крылов В.И., Бобков В.В., Монастырский П.И. Вычислительные методы, T. 1. – М: Наука, 1976 – 304 с. [Krilov VI,_ Bobkov VV, Monastirskii PI. Vichislitelnie metodi. Vol.1. Moscow: Nauka; 1976, 304 p. (In Russ.)].
- Дроздов С.В., Матин В.И., Чернышёв С.В. Характеристики систем синхронной тяги и направления экипажей высокоскоростного транспорта // Известия вузов «Электромеханика». – 1983. – № 2. – C. 43–47. [Drozdov SV, Matin VI, Chernyshev SV. Harakteristiki sistem sinhronnoi tyagi i napravleniya ekipajei visokoskorostnogo transporta. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii. Elektromekhanika. 1990;2:13-18. (In Russ.)].

# Supplementary files

Supplementary Files | Action | ||

1. | View (24KB) | Indexing metadata | |

2. | View (18KB) | Indexing metadata | |

3. | View (35KB) | Indexing metadata | |

4. | View (31KB) | Indexing metadata |