Origin, genetic diversity and migration routes of cultivated emmer Triticum dicoccum

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

During the period of significant climatic and environmental changes and the constant growth of the human population, new effective approaches in wheat breeding are required, in particular, the study of genetic and genomic diversity, origin and migration routes of species genetically related to common wheat, which could be donors of genes controlling economically valuable characteristics. Such species include the cultivated emmer Triticum dicoccum (Schrank) Schuebl. With subgenomes A and B (2n = 28), similar to the corresponding subgenomes of hexaploidcommon wheat. The review examines the issues of genetic and genomic diversity of cultivated emmer, its domestication and routes of distribution. The characteristics of some T. dicoccum genes introduced into common and durum wheat, or promising for further use in breeding, are given.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

А. Fisenko

Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: fisenko800@mail.ru
Rússia, Moscow, 119991

А. Dragovich

Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: dragova@mail.ru
Rússia, Moscow, 119991

Bibliografia

  1. Zohary D., Hopf M., Weiss E. Domestication of plants in the Old World, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2012. 316 p.
  2. Feldman M. The world wheat book. A history of wheat breeding. Paris: Lavoiser Publ. 2001. P. 3–56.
  3. Ozkan H., Brandolini A., Pozzi C. et al. A reconsideration of the domestication geography of tetraploid wheats //Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005. V. 110. № 6. P. 1052–1060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-1925-8
  4. Luo M.-C., Yang Z.-L., You F.M. et al. The structure of wild and domesticated emmer wheat populations, gene flow between them, and the site of emmer domestication // Theor. Appl. Genet. 2007. V. 114. № 6. P. 947–959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0474-0
  5. Avni R. Nave M., Barad O. et al. Wild emmer genome architecture and diversity elucidate wheat evolution and domestication // Science. 2017. V. 357. P. 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan0032
  6. Salamini F., Ozkan H., Brandolini A. et al. Genetics and geography of wild cereal domestication in the Near East // Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002.V. 3. P. 429–441. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg817
  7. Nesbitt M. When and where did domesticated cereals first occur in southwest Asia? // The Down of Farming in the Near East. Berlin: Ex oriente, 2002. P. 113–132.
  8. Гончаров Н.П., Кондратенко Е.Я. Происхождение, доместикация и эволюция пшениц // Вестник ВОГиС. 2008. Т. 12. № 1/2. С.159–179.
  9. Zohary D. Unconscious selection and the evolution of domesticated plants // Econ. Bot. 2004. V. 58(1). P. 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2004)058[0005:usateo]2.0.co;2
  10. Дорофеев В.Ф., Якубцинер М.М., Руденко М.И. и др. Пшеницы мира. Л.: Колос, 1976. 486 с.
  11. Lev-Yadun S., Gopher A., Abbo S. The cradle of agriculture // Science. 2000. V. 288. № 5471. P. 1602–1603. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5471.1602
  12. Dubcovsky J., Dvorak J. Genome plasticity a key factor in the success of polyploid wheat under domestication // Science. 2007. V. 316. № 5833. P. 1862–1866. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1143986
  13. Levy A. A., Feldman M. Evolution and origin of bread wheat // Plant Cell. 2022. V. 34. P. 2549–2567. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koac130
  14. Arzani A., Ashraf M. Cultivated ancient wheats (Triticum spp.): A potential source of health‐beneficial food products // Comprehensive Rev. in Food Sci. and Food Safety. 2017.V. 16. № 3. P. 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12262
  15. Zhao X., Guo Y., Kang L. et al. Population genomics unravels the Holocene history of bread wheat and its relatives // Nat. Plants. 2023.V. 9.P.403–419. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-023-01367-3
  16. Weiss H., Wetterstrom W., Nadel D., Bar-Yosef O. The board spectrum revisited: Evidence from plant remains // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U S A. 2004. V. 101. P. 9551–9555. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402362101
  17. Snir A., Nadel D., Groman-Yaroslavski I. et al. The origin of cultivation and protoweeds, long before Neolithic farming //PLoS One. 2015. V. 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131422
  18. Гончаров Н.П. Сравнительная генетика пшениц и их сородичей. Новосибирск: Гео, 2012. 523 с.
  19. Arranz-Otaegui A., Colledge S., Ibanez J.J., Zapata L. Crop husbandry activities and wild plant gathering, use and consumption at the EPPNB Tell Qarassa North (south Syria) // Veget. Hist. Archaeobot. 2016. V. 25. P. 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-016-0564-0
  20. Harlan J.R., Zohary D. Distribution of wild wheats and barley // Science. 1966. V. 153. P. 1074–1080.
  21. Bar-Yosef O. The Natufian culture in the Levant, threshold to the origins of agriculture // Evolut. Anthropol. 1998. V. 6. P. 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6505(1998)6:5<159::aid-evan4>3.0.co;2-7
  22. Riehl S., Zeidi M., Conard N.J. Emergence of agriculture in the foothills of the Zagros Mountains of Iran // Science. 2013. V. 341. P. 65–67. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1236743
  23. Jones M.K., Allaby R.G., Brown T.A. Wheat domestication // Science. 1998. V. 279. № 5349. P. 302–303.
  24. Oliveira H.R., Jacocks L., Czajkowska B.I. et al. Multiregional origins of the domesticated tetraploid wheats //PLoS One. 2020. V. 15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227148
  25. Ozkan H., Brandolini A., Schafer-Pregl R., Salamini F. AFLP analysis of a collection of tetraploid wheat indicated the origin of emmer and hard wheat domestication in southeastern Turkey // Mol. Biol. Evol. 2002. V. 19. P. 1797–1801. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004002
  26. Mori N., Ishii T., Ishido T. et al. Origins of domesticated emmer and common wheat inferred from chloroplast DNA fingerprinting // Proc. 10th Intern. Wheat Genet. Symp. (1–6 September 2003, Paestum, Italy). Rome: Instituto Sperimentale per la Cereali coltura, 2003. P. 25–28.
  27. Heun M., Schaefer-Pregl R., Klawan D. et al. Site of einkorn wheat domestication identified by DNA fingerprinting // Science. 1997.V. 278. № 5341. P. 1312–1314. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.278.5341.1312
  28. Civáň P., Ivaničová Z., Brown T.A. Reticulated origin of domesticated emmer wheat supports a dynamic model for the emergence of agriculture in the fertile crescent // PLoS One. 2013.V. 8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081955
  29. Badaeva E.D., Keilwagen J., Knüpffer H. et al. Chromosomal passports provide new insights into diffusion of emmer wheat //PLoS One. 2015.V. 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128556
  30. Iob A., Botiguе L. Genomic analysis of emmer wheat shows a complex history with two distinct domestic groups and evidence of differential hybridization with wild emmer from the western Fertile Crescent // Veget. History and Archaeobotany. 2023. V. 32. P. 545–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-022-00898-7
  31. Zhou Y., Zhao X., Li Y. et al. Triticum population sequencing provides insights into wheat adaptation // Nat. Genetics. 2020. V. 52. P. 1412–1422. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-020-00722-w
  32. Cheng H., Liu J., Wen J. et al. Frequent intra- and inter-species introgression shapes the landscape of genetic variation in bread wheat // Genome Biol. 2019. V. 20. P. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1744-x
  33. Мак Кей Дж. Генетические основы систематики пшениц // С.-х. биология. 1968. Т. 3. № 1. С. 12–25.
  34. Watanabe N., Ikebata N. The effects of homoeologous group 3 chromosomes on grain colour dependent seed dormancy and brittle rachis in tetraploid wheat // Euphytica. 2000. V. 115. P. 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004066416900
  35. Watanabe N., Sugiyama K., Yamagishi Y., Sakata Y. Comparative telosomic mapping of homoeologous genes for brittle rachis in tetraploid and hexaploid wheats // Hereditas. 2002. V. 137. P. 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-5223.2002.01609.x
  36. Li W., Gill B.S. Multiple genetic pathways for seed shattering in the grasses // Funct. Integr. Genomics. 2006. V. 6. P. 300–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-005-0015-y
  37. Tsujimoto H. Production of near-isogenic lines and marked monosomic lines in common wheat (Triticum aestivum) cv. Chinese spring // J. Heredity. 2001. V. 92. P. 254–259. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/92.3.254
  38. Kosuge K., Watanabe N., Melnik V.M. et al. New sources of compact spike morphology determined by the genes on chromosome 5A in hexaploid wheat // Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2012. V. 59. P. 1115–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-011-9747-9
  39. Simonetti M.C., Bellomo M.P., Laghetti G. et al. Quantitative trait loci influencing free-threshing habit in tetraploid wheats // Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 1999. V. 46. P. 267–271. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008602009133
  40. Matsuoka Y. Evolution of polyploid Triticum wheats under cultivation: The role of domestication, natural hybridization and allopolyploid speciation in their diversification // Plant Cell Physiol. 2011. V. 52. P. 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcr018
  41. Nevo E. Evolution of wild emmer wheat and crop improvement // J. Systematics and Evolution. 2014.V. 52 № 6. P. 673–696. https://doi.org./10.1111/jse.12124
  42. Peng J., Ronin Y., Fahima T. et al. Domestication quantitative trait loci in Triticum dicoccoides, the progenitor of wheat // Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003.V. 100. P. 2489–2494. https:doi.org.10.1073/pnas.252763199
  43. Ling H.-Q., Zhao S., Liu D. et al. Draft genome of the wheat A‐genome progenitor Triticum urartu // Nature. 2013. V. 496. P. 87–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11997
  44. He F., Pasam R., Shi F. et al. Exome sequencing highlights the role of wild-relative introgression in shaping the adaptive landscape of the wheat genome // Nat. Genetics. 2019. V. 51. P. 896–904. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0382-2
  45. Nyine M., Adhikari E., Clinesmith M. et al. Genomic patterns of introgression in interspecific populations created by crossing wheat with its wild relative // Genes Genomes Genetics Early Online. 2020. g3.401479.2020. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.120.401479
  46. Tanno K., Willcox G. How fast was wild wheat domesticated? // Science. 2006.V. 311. № 5769. P. 1886. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1124635
  47. van Zeist W., Bakker-Heeres J.A.H. Archaeobotanical studies in the Levant. 1. Neolithic sites in the Damascus basin: Aswad, Ghoraife, Ramad // Palaeohistoria. 1975. V. 24. P. 165–256.
  48. Feldman M., Kislev M.E. Domestication of emmer wheat and evolution of free-threshing tetraploid wheat // Israel J. Plant Sci. 2007. V. 55. P. 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1560/IJPS.55.3-4.207
  49. Lev-Yadun S., Gopher A., Abbo S. How and when was wild wheat domesticated? // Science. 2006. V. 313. № 5785. P. 296–297. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.313.5785.296b
  50. Flavell R., Oʹdell M., Sharp P. et al. Variation in the intergenic spacer of ribosomal DNA of wild wheat, Triticum dicoccoides, in Israel // Mol. Biol. Evol. 1986.V. 3. P. 547–558.
  51. Dong P., Wei Y.-M., Chen G.-Y. et al. Sequence‐related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) of wild emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccoides) in Israel and its ecological association // Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2010. V. 38. P. 1–11.
  52. Dong P., Wei Y.-M., Chen G.-Y. et al. 2009. EST–SSR diversity correlated with ecological and genetic factors of wild emmer wheat in Israel // Hereditas. 2009. V. 146. P. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.2009.02098.x
  53. Haudry A., Cenci A., Ravel C. et al. Grinding up wheat: A massive loss of nucleotide diversity since domestication // Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007.V. 24. P. 1506–1517. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm077
  54. Ozkan H., Willcox G., Graner A. et al. Geographic distribution and domestication of wild emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccoides) // Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2011. V. 58. P. 11–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-010-9581-5
  55. Ganugi P., Palchetti E., Gori M.et al. Molecular diversity within a mediterranean and European panel of tetraploid wheat (T. turgidum subsp.) landraces and modern germplasm inferred using a high-density SNP array // Agronomy. 2021. V. 11. P. 414. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030414
  56. Thuillet A.C., Bataillon T., Poirier S. et al. Estimation of long-term effective population sizes through the history of durum wheat using microsatellite data // Genetics. 2005.V. 169. P. 1589–1599. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.029553
  57. Столетова E.A. Полба-эммер, Triticumdicoccum Schrank // Тр. поприкл. ботанике, генетике и селекции. 1924. Т. 14. Вып. 1. С. 27–98.
  58. Фляксбергер К.А. Пшеницы – род Triticum L. // Культурная флора СССР. Т. 1. Хлебные злаки. Л.: Сельхозгиз, 1935. С. 19–434.
  59. Цвелев Н.Н., Пробатова Н.С. Злаки России. М.: KMK., 2019. 649 с.
  60. Вавилов Н.И. Пшеницы Абиссинии и их положение в общей системе пшениц: к познанию 28-хромосомной группы культурных пшениц. Л.: ВИР., 1931. С. 221–228.
  61. Scott M.F., Botigué L.R., Brace S. et al. 3000-year-old Egyptian emmer wheat genome reveals dispersal and domestication history // Nat. Plants. 2019. V. 5. P. 1120–1128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0534-5
  62. Yadav I.S., Singh N., Wu S. et al. Exploring genetic diversity of wild and related tetraploid wheat species Triticum turgidum and Triticum timopheevii // J. Adv. Research. 2023. V. 48. P. 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2022.08.020
  63. Cavalli-Sforza L.L., Menozzi P., Piazza P. The history and geography of human genes. Princeton: PrincetonUniv. Press, 1994.
  64. Вавилов Н.И. Центры происхождения культурных растений // Тр. По прикл. ботанике и селекции. 1926. Т. 16. № 2. 248 c.
  65. Mellaart J. The Neolithic of the Near East. London: ThamesandHudson, 1975. 101 p.
  66. Harris D.R., Masson V.M., Berezin Y.E. et al. Investigating early agriculture in Central Asia: New research at Jeitun, Turkmenistan // Antiquity. 1993. V. 67. № 255. P. 324–338.
  67. Zaharieva M., Ayana N.G., Al Hakimi A. et al. Cultivated emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccon Schrank), an old crop with promising future: a review // Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2010. V. 57. P. 937–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-010-9572-6
  68. Stevens C.J., Murphy C., Roberts R. et al. Between China and South Asia: A middle Asian corridor of crop dispersal and agricultural innovation in the Bronze Age // Holocene. 2016. V. 26. P. 1541–1555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683616650268
  69. Mani B. R. Further evidence on Kashmir Neolithic in the light of recent excavations at Kanishkapura // J. Interdisciplinary Studies in History and Archaeology. 2004. V. 1. P. 137–143.
  70. Nesbitt M., Samuel D. From staple crop to extinction? The archaeology and history of the hulled wheat // Hulled wheats: Promoting the Conservation and used of underutilized and neglected crops / Eds Padulosi S., Hammer K., Heller J. Rome: IPGRI, 1996. P. 40–99.
  71. Mehra K.L. The origin, domestication and selection of crops for specific Yemeni environments // Indigenous Knowledge and Sustainable Agriculture in Yemen / Eds Al-Hakimi A., Pelat F. Sana: Centre Français dʹArchéologie et de Sciences Sociales, Cahiers du CEFAS, 2003. P. 9–14.
  72. Hammer K., Gebauer J., Al Khanjari S., Buerkert A. Oman at the cross-road of inter-regional exchange of cultivated plants // Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 2009. V. 56. P. 547–560. https:doi.org.10.1007/s10722-008-9385-z
  73. Вавилов Н.И. Мировые ресурсы сортов хлебных злаков, зерновых бобовых, льна и их использование в селекции. М.: Наука, 1964. 122 с.
  74. Драгович А.Ю., Фисенко А.В., Янковская А.А. Гены яровизации (VRN) и фотопериода (PPD) у староместных яровых сортов гексаплоидной пшеницы // Генетика. 2021. T. 57. № 3. C. 332–344. https:doi.org.10.31857/S0016675821030061
  75. Пухальский В.А., Билинская Е.Н. Материалы по изучению генов гибридного некроза у сортообразцов вида Triticum dicoccum (Schrank) Schuebl // Генетика. 1999. Т. 35. № 10. С. 1390–1395.
  76. Weninger B., Clare L., Gerritsen F. et al. Neolithisation of the Aegean and Southeast Europe during the 6600–6000 calBC period of Rapid // Documenta Praehistorica XLI. 2014. V. 41. P. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.4312/dp.41.1
  77. Палагута И.В. Мир искусства древних земледельцев Европы. Культуры балкано-карпатского круга в VII–III тыс. до н.э. СПб.: Алетейя, 2012. 336 с.
  78. Periс S. Drenovac: A Neolithic settlement in the Middle Morava Valley, Serbia // Antiquity. 2017. V. 91. № 357. P. 11–33. https//doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2017.41
  79. Marinova E. Archaeobotanical data from the early Neolithic of Bulgaria // The Origins and Spread of Domestic Plants in Southwest Asia and Europe / Eds Colledge S., Connelly J. London: Institute of Archaeology, 2007. P. 93–109.
  80. Pashkevich G.F. Agriculture in East European steppe and forest-steppe in the Neolithic-Bronze Ages: paleoethnobotanical evidence // Stratum Plus. 2000. V. 2. P. 404–418.
  81. Baldia M.O. The Central and North European Neolithic. Copper Age Chronology // The Comparative Archaeology Web. 2006. https://www.comp-archaeology.org/Central_European_Neolithic_Chronology.html
  82. Тагиева E.H., Велиев C.C. Природные условия и первые земледельческо-скотоводческие культуры Азербайджана //Изв. РАН. Серия геогр. 2014. № 2. C. 103–115.
  83. LisitsinaG.N. The Caucasus, a centre of ancient farming in Eurasia // Plants and Ancient Man. / Eds van Zeis W., Casparie W.A. Rotterdam: Balkema, 1984. P. 285–292.
  84. Туганаев В.В., Туганаев А.В. Агроэкосистемы Предуралья и Среднего Поволжья: от начала земледелия до современности // Бюлл. бот. сада Саратовского гос. ун-та. 2009. № 8. С.25–46.
  85. Зинько В.Н., Пашкевич Г.А. Палеоботанические материалы из ранних комплексов Тиритаки // Боспорские исследования. 2010. Вып. ХХIV. С. 65–83.
  86. Артамонов М.И. История хазар. Л.: Изд-во Гос. Эрмитажа, 1962. 523 с.
  87. Плетнева С.А. От кочевий к городам. Салтово-маяцкая культура. М.: Наука, 1967. 200 с.
  88. Damania A.B., Valkoun J., Willcox G. et al. The origin of agriculture and crop domestication. Aleppo: ICARDA, 1998. 352 р.
  89. Муслимов М.Г., Исмаилов А.Б. Полба – ценная зерновая культура // Зерновое хозяйство России. 2012. №. 3. С. 40–42.
  90. Государственный реестр селекционных достижений, допущенных к использованию. Т.1. “Сорта растений” (официальное издание). М., 2023. https://reestr.gossortrf.ru/
  91. Clark J.A., Martin J.H., Ball C.R. Classification of American Wheat Varieties // Bull. USDAN 1074. Washington, 1922. 238 p.
  92. Рабинович С.В. Современные сорта пшеницы и их родословные. Киев: Урожай, 1972. 327 с.
  93. Hsam S.L.K., Huang X.Q., Zeller. Chromosomal location of genes for resistance to powdery mildew in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Alleles at the Pm5 locus // Theor. Appl. Genetics. 2001. V. 102. P. 127–133.
  94. Beuningen L.V., Bush R.H. Genetic diversity among North American spring wheat cultivars // Crop Sci. 1997. V. 37. P. 580–585. https://doi.org/10.2135/CROPSCI1997.0011183X003700030046X
  95. Luig N.H. A survey of virulence genes in wheat stem rust, Pucciniagraminis f. sp. Tritici // Suppl. to J. Plant Breed.: Advances in Plant Breeding. 1983. V. 11. 198 p.
  96. McIntosh R.A., Wellings C.R., Park R.F. Wheat rust. An atlas of resistance genes. Australia: CSIRO, 1995. 200 p.
  97. Сорта зерновых культур с известными генами устойчивости к грибным болезням // Каталог мировой коллекции ВИР. Вып. 453. Л.: ВИР, 1988. 79 с.
  98. Robe P., Doussinault G. Genetic analysis of powdery-mildew resistance of a winter wheat line, RE714, and identification of a new specific-resistance gene // Plant Breeding. 1995. V. 114. P. 387–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1995.tb00817.x
  99. Liu X., Brown-Guedira G.L., Hatchett J.O. et al. Genetic characterization and molecular mapping of a Hessian fly-resistance gene transferred from T. turgidum ssp. dicoccum to common wheat // Theor. Appl. Genetics. 2005. V. 111. P. 1308–1315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-0059-3

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar
2. Fig. 1. Map of the Near East (the figure from [6] is used, with changes and additions to [7, 8]). Dotted lines indicate the boundaries of the Fertile Crescent; circles indicate the places of detection of only wild wheat and barley, squares indicate the places of detection of wild and domesticated forms of barley and wheat, diamonds indicate the places of detection of only cultivated forms of barley and wheat. 1 – Armenia, 2 – Azerbaijan, 3 – Georgia, 4 – Russia, 5 – the Caspian Sea, 6 – the Karakadag mountain range.

Baixar (282KB)
Metadados
3. Fig. 2. Domestication genes and ear morphotype in tetraploid species (according to [13], with changes). 1 – mutations of the Br-1 genes during the transition from T. dicoccoides to T. dicoccum; 2 – mutations of the Tg genes during the transition from T. dicoccum to nudibranch tetraploid species.

Baixar (238KB)
Metadados

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024