Himičeskaâ fizikaHimičeskaâ fizikaХимическая физика0207-401XThe Russian Academy of Sciences68095310.31857/S0207401X24100069Химическая физика экологических процессовResearch ArticleRemote detection of emergency emissions and gas leaksДистанционное обнаружение аварийных выбросов и утечек газовRodionovI. D.РодионовИ. Д.
Russian Federation
gomorevma@gmail.comGomorevM. A.ГоморевМ. А.
Russian Federation
gomorevma@gmail.comRodionovaI. P.РодионоваИ. П.
Russian Federation
gomorevma@gmail.comRodionovA. I.РодионовА. И.
Russian Federation
gomorevma@gmail.comShapovalovV. L.ШаповаловВ. Л.
Russian Federation
gomorevma@gmail.comShestakovD. V.ШестаковД. В.
Russian Federation
gomorevma@gmail.comGolubkovM. G.ГолубковМ. Г.
Russian Federation
gomorevma@gmail.comSemenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of SciencesФедеральный исследовательский центр химической физики им. Н.Н. Семёнова Российской академии наукAO Scientific and Technical Center ReagentЗАО “Научно-технический центр “Реагент”151020244310718029052025Copyright ©; 2024, Russian Academy of SciencesCopyright ©; 2024, Российская академия наук2024Russian Academy of SciencesРоссийская академия наукhttps://transsyst.ru/0207-401X/article/view/680953

There are many reasons for natural gas (methane) leaks in gas distribution networks. One of the most important tasks of gas distribution organizations is to promptly identify and eliminate gas leaks before they cause emergency situations. Eliminating gas leaks as soon as possible will minimize the negative impact on the environment. This paper proposes a new original method for detecting emergency gas emissions into the atmosphere and leaks on gas pipeline systems. The technique involves the simultaneous use of both experimental and calculated data to determine the concentration and characteristic sizes of gas emissions. The methodology was tested at laboratory conditions using a propane cylinder and a gas burner. The Scorpion monophotonic sensor was used as recording equipment. As a result of processing experimental data and mathematical modeling using computational fluid dynamics methods, the dependence of propane concentration on the distance to the burner was constructed and the characteristic dimensions of the gas cloud were determined.There are many reasons for natural gas (methane) leaks in gas distribution networks. One of the most important tasks of gas distribution organizations is to promptly identify and eliminate gas leaks before they cause emergency situations. Eliminating gas leaks as soon as possible will minimize the negative impact on the environment. This paper proposes a new original method for detecting emergency gas emissions into the atmosphere and leaks on gas pipeline systems. The technique involves the simultaneous use of both experimental and calculated data to determine the concentration and characteristic sizes of gas emissions. The methodology was tested at laboratory conditions using a propane cylinder and a gas burner. The Scorpion monophotonic sensor was used as recording equipment. As a result of processing experimental data and mathematical modeling using computational fluid dynamics methods, the dependence of propane concentration on the distance to the burner was constructed and the characteristic dimensions of the gas cloud were determined.

Существует множество причин для возникновения утечки природного газа (метана) в сети газораспределения. Одна из важнейших задач газораспределительных организаций – своевременно идентифицировать и устранить утечки газа до того, как они станут причиной аварийных и нештатных ситуаций. Скорейшее устранение утечек газа минимизирует негативное влияние на экологию. В настоящей работе предложена новая оригинальная методика по обнаружению аварийных выбросов газов в атмосферу и утечек в системах газопроводов. Методика предполагает одновременное использование как экспериментальных, так и расчетных данных для определения концентрации выбрасываемого газа и характерных линейных размеров газового облака. Апробация методики проведена в лабораторных условиях с использованием баллона с пропаном и газовой горелки. В качестве регистрирующей аппаратуры применялся монофотонный сенсор “Скорпион”. В результате обработки данных эксперимента и математического моделирования с использованием методов вычислительной газовой динамики построена зависимость концентрации пропана от расстояния до горелки и определены характерные размеры газового облака.

atmosphereemergency gas releasesgas pipeline leakhyperspectrometermonophotonic sensorignition delay timecomputational gas dynamicsатмосферааварийные выбросы газаутечка на газопроводегиперспектрометрмонофотонный датчиквремя задержки воспламенениявычислительная газовая динамикаГосзадание Министерства науки и высшего образования Российской ФедерацииState assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation122040500060-4H.M.A. van der Werff, M.F. Noomen, M. van der Meijde, J.F. Kooistra, and F.D. van der Meer, in: New Developments and Challenges in Remote Sensing, Ed by Z. Bochenek (Millpress, Rotterdam, 2007), p. 707.Van der Werff H.M.A., Noomen M.F., van der Meijde M. et al. // New Developments and Challenges in Remote Sensing / Ed. Bochenek. Z. /Rotterdam: Millpress, 2007. P. 707.S. Sabbah, P. Rusch,. J. H. Gerhard, et al., in: Proceedings of Electro-Optical Remote Sensing, Photonic Technologies, and Applications V, Ed by G.W. Kamerman, O. Steinvall, G.J. Bishop, J.D. Gonglewski, K.L. Lewis, R.C. Hollins, and T.J. Merlet, Proc. SPIE 8186, 81860S (2011). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.899687Sabbah S., Rusch P., Gerhard J.H. et al. // Electro-Optical Remote Sensing, Photonic Technologies, and Applications V / Eds. Kamerman G.W., Steinvall O., Bishop G.J., et al. Proc. SPIE. 2011. V. 8186. 81860S; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.899687P. Ma, T.G. Mondal, Z. Shi, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 12018 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c03345Ma P., Mondal T.G., Shi Z. et al. // Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024. V. 58. P. 12018; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c03345M.A. Gagnon, P. Tremblay, S. Savary, et al., in: Proceedings of Advanced Environmental, Chemical, and Biological Sensing Technologies XI, Ed by T. Vo-Dinh, R. A. Lieberman, and G. G. Gauglitz, Proc. SPIE 9106, 91060C (2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2050588Gagnon M.A., Tremblay P., Savary S. et al. // Advanced Environmental, Chemical, and Biological Sensing Technologies XI / Eds. Vo-Dinh T., Lieberman R.A., Gauglitz G.G. . Proc. SPIE. 2014. V. 9106. 91060C; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2050588D.M. Tratt, K.N. Buckland, E.R. Keim, and P. D. Johnson, in: Proceedings of 2016 8th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS) (IEEE, Los Angeles, 2016), p. 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/WHISPERS.2016.8071711Tratt D.M., Buckland K.N., Keim E.R. et al. // Proc. 8th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS). Los Angeles: IEEE, 2016. P. 1; https://doi.org/10.1109/WHISPERS.2016.8071711W. Xavier, N. Labat, G. Audouin, et al., in: Proceedings of Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference (16ADIP) (SPE, Abu Dhabi, 2016), SPE-183527-MS; https://doi.org/10.2118/183527-MSXavier W., Labat N., Audouin G. et al. // Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference (16ADIP). Abu Dhabi: SPE, 2016. SPE-183527-MS; https://doi.org/10.2118/183527-MSR.P.M. Scafutto and C. R. De Souza Filho, Remote Sens. 10, 1237 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10081237Scafutto R.P.M., De Souza Filho C.R. // Remote Sens. 2018. V. 10. № 8. 1237; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10081237C. Xiao, B. Fu, H. Shui, Z. Guo, and J. Zhu, Remote Sens. 12, 537 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030537Xiao C., Fu B., Shui H. et al. // Remote Sens. 2020. V. 12. № 3. 537; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030537N. M. Rubtsov, A. N. Vinogradov, A. P. Kalinin, et al., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 13, 305 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793119020210Рубцов Н.М., Виноградов А.Н., Калинин А.П. и др. // Хим. физика. 2019. Т. 38. № 4. С. 53; https://doi.org/10.1134/S0207401X19040101A.I. Rodionov, I.D. Rodionov, I.P. Rodionova, et al., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 15, 904 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793121050201Родионов А.И., Родионов И.Д., Родионова И.П. и др. // Хим. физика. 2021. Т. 40. № 10. С. 61; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X21100113N. Rubtsov, M. Alymov, A. Kalinin, et al., Remote studies of combustion and explosion processes based on optoelectronic methods (AUS PUBLISHERS, Melbourne, 2022). https://doi.org/10.26526/monography_62876066a124d8.04785158Rubtsov N., Alymov M., Kalinin A. et al. Remote studies of combustion and explosion processes based on optoelectronic methods. Melbourne: AUS PUBLISHERS, 2022; https://doi.org/10.26526/monography_62876066a124d8.04785158P.J. Roache, Computational fluid dynamics (Mir, Moscow, 1980).Роуч П. Вычислительная гидродинамика. М.: Мир, 1980.ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide. Canonsburg: SAS Inc., 2013.Star-CCM+. https://star-ccm.com/Introduction to COMSOL Multiphysics. https://www.comsol.com/Введение в COMSOL Multiphysics; https://www.comsol.com/Flow Vision. https://flowvisioncfd.com/en/Flow Vision; https://flowvisioncfd.com/en/SALOME version 9.12.0. https://www.salome-platform.org/?p=2657SALOME version 9.12.0; https://www.salome-platform.org/?p=2657J. Schwarz, K. Axelsson, D. Anheuer, et al., SoftwareX 22, 101378 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2023.101378Schwarz J., Axelsson K., Anheuer D. et al. // SoftwareX. 2023. V. 22. 101378; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2023.101378I.A. Belov and S. A. Isaev, Simulation of turbulent flows (Publishing House of Baltic State Technical University, St. Petersburg, 2001).Белов И.А., Исаев С.А. Моделирование турбулентных течений. Санкт-Петербург: Изд-во Балтийского ГТУ, 2001.D.C. Wilcox, Turbulence modelling for CFD (Birmingham Press, San Diego, 2006).Wilcox D.C. Turbulence modelling for CFD. San Diego: Birmingham Press, 2006.K.N. Volkov and V.N. Emelyanov, Large eddy simulation in calculations of turbulent flows (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2008).Волков К.Н., Емельянов В.Н. Моделирование крупных вихрей в расчетах турбулентных течений. М.: Физматлит, 2008.J.W. Leachman, R.T. Jacobsen, E. W. Lemmon, and S.G. Penoncello, Thermodynamic properties of cryogenic fluids, Ed by S. W. Van Sciver and S. Jeong (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57835-4Leachman J.W., Jacobsen R.T., Lemmon E.W. et al. Thermodynamic properties of cryogenic fluids / Eds. Van Sciver S.W., Jeong S.. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57835-4R. Span, Multiparameter equations of state (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04092-8Span R. Multiparameter equations of state. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04092-8E.W. Lemmon, I.H. Bell, M.L. Huber, and M. O. McLinden, NIST Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties Database (REFPROP), Version 10.0 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, 2018).Lemmon E.W., Bell I.H., Huber M.L. et al. NIST Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties Database (REFPROP) Ver. 10.0. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2018.M. A. Goldshtik and V. N. Stern, Hydrodynamic Stability and Turbulence (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1977).Гольдштик М.А., Штерн В.Н. Гидродинамическая устойчивость и турбулентность. Новосибирск: Наука, 1977.H. Schlichting and K. Gersten, Boundary-layer theory (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52919-5Schlichting H., Gersten K. Boundary-layer theory. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2017; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52919-5Rostechnadzor Order No. 415 dated 11/28/2022 “On Approval of the Safety Manual “Methodology for assessing the consequences of accidents at explosive and flammable chemical industries”. 2022. https://set.rk.gov.ru/uploads/txteditor/set/attachments/d4/1d/8c/d98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e/phpIW8esL_1.pdfПриказ Ростехнадзора от 28.11.2022 № 415 “Об утверждении Руководства по безопасности “Методика оценки последствий аварий на взрывопожароопасных химических производствах”. 2022; https://set.rk.gov.ru/uploads/txteditor/set/attachments/d4/1d/8c/d98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e/phpIW8esL_1.pdfSafety manual “Methodology for modeling the spread of accidental emissions of hazardous substances”. (Moscow: 2015). https://meganorm.ru/Data2/1/ 4293763/4293763998.pdfРуководство по безопасности “Методика моделирования распространения аварийных выбросов опасных веществ”. М.: ЗАО НТЦ ПБ, 2015.FLACS-CFD Release 24.1. https://www.gexcon.com/software/flacs-cfd/FLACS-CFD Release 24.1; https://www.gexcon.com/software/flacs-cfd/A.S. Monin and A. M. Obukhov, Trudy geofiz. Inst. Akad. Nauk U.R.S.S. 24, 163 (1954).Монин А.С., Обухов А.М. // Тр. Геофиз. Инст-та АН СССР. 1954. Т. 24. № 151. С. 163.D. Tiab and E. C. Donaldson, Petrophysics: theory and practice of measuring of reservoir rock and fluid transport properties (Gulf Professional Publishing, Oxford, 2004).Tiab D., Donaldson E.C. Petrophysics: theory and practice of measuring of reservoir rock and fluid transport properties. Oxford: Gulf Professional Publishing, 2004.K.S. Basniev, I.N. Kochina, and V.M. Maksimov, Underground hydromechanics (Nedra, Moscow, 1993).Басниев К.С., Кочина И.Н., Максимов В.М. Подземная гидромеханика. М.: Недра, 1993.K. S. Basniev, N. M. Dmitriev, and G. D. Rozenberg, Oil and gas hydromechanics (Institute for Computer Research, Moscow, Izhevsk, 2005).Басниев К.С., Дмитриев Н.М., Розенберг Г.Д. Нефтегазовая гидромеханика. М.–Ижевск: Институт компьютерных исследований, 2005.D. Yuhu, G. Huilin, Z. Jingen, and F. Yaorong, Chem. Eng. J. 92, 237 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-8947(02)00259-0Yuhu D., Huilin G., Jingen Z. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2003. V. 92. № 1–3. P. 237; https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-8947(02)00259-0A. A. Belov, A. P. Kalinin, I. V. Krysyuk, et al., Sensors and Systems 1, 47 (2010).Белов А.А., Калинин А.П., Крысюк И.В. и др. // Датчики и системы. 2010. № 1. С. 47.A. P. Kalinin, V. V. Egorov, A. I. Rodionov, et al., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 17, 796 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793123040085Калинин А.П., Егоров В.В., Родионов А.И. и др. // Хим. физика. 2023. Т. 42. № 7. С. 17; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23070087A. I. Rodionov, I. D. Rodionov, I. P. Rodionova, et al., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 17, 1246 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793123050275Родионов А.И., Родионов И.Д., Родионова И.П. и др. // Хим. физика. 2023. Т. 42. № 10. C. 96; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23100138P.V. Kozlov, I.E. Zabelinsky, N.G. Bykova, et al., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 16, 883 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793122050049Козлов П.В., Забелинский И.Е., Быкова Н.Г. и др. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 9. С. 26; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22090047Il.S. Golyak, D.R. Anfimov, I.B. Vintaykin, et al., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 17, 320 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793123020264Голяк Ил.С., Анфимов Д.Р., Винтайкин И.Б. и др. // Хим. физика. 2023. Т. 42. № 4. C. 3; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23040088A.N. Morozov, S.E. Tabalin, D.R. Anfimov, et al., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 18, 763 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793124700234Морозов А.Н., Табалин С.Е., Анфимов Д.Р. и др. // Хим. физика. 2024. Т. 43. № 6.