<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">World esonomy and international relations</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">World esonomy and international relations</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Мировая экономика и международные отношения</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0131-2227</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2782-4330</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Primakov Institute of World Economy and International Relations</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">700182</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>The world at the beginning of the millennium</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Мир в начале тысячелетия</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">GLOBAL TRADE: LONG-TERM TRENDS AND STRUCTURAL CHANGES</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>МИРОВАЯ ТОРГОВЛЯ: ДОЛГОСРОЧНЫЕ ТРЕНДЫ И СТРУКТУРНЫЕ СДВИГИ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1772-1800</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Varnavsky</surname><given-names>Vladimir Gavrilovich</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Варнавский</surname><given-names>Владимир Гаврилович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>-</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Primakov Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO)</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ИМЭМО им. Е. М. Примакова РАН</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Institute of Control Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Институт проблем управления РАН</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-01-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>01</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>68</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 68, NO1 (2024)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 68, №1 (2024)</issue-title><fpage>5</fpage><lpage>18</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-12-31"><day>31</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2024, Russian Academy of Sciences</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2024, Российская академия наук</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Russian Academy of Sciences</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Российская академия наук</copyright-holder></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://transsyst.ru/0131-2227/article/view/700182">https://transsyst.ru/0131-2227/article/view/700182</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper considers long-term trends of global trade and there structural changes. We determine the elasticity of trade to GDP and the dynamics of the ratio of goods and services exports, as well as structural shifts in the major countries and regions of the world. The case study was focused on the USA–China trade relations and contradictions. Since 2007, PRC is the undisputed world’s largest exporter of goods. According to author’s estimates, in 2022 China was ahead of the United States in the total merchandise export by 1.5 trillion dollars. This corresponds to 6.3% of total world exports or 5.8% of US GDP. The trade war unleashed by former president D. Trump administration in 2018–2019 inevitably resulted in a decline in bilateral trade. However, this was just a temporary trend. The recent WTO statistics shows that US imports from China recovered by 2021 both in general volume and in the main categories of goods, both for intermediate and final consumption. Moreover, in 2022 its value, in particular for the analyzed commodity groups (aluminum, iron and steel) exceeded the indicators of 2017–2018. The author argues that, most importantly, there are long-term and fundamental implications of the trade conflict between the US and China rather than a transient decrease in mutual trade between the two flagships of globalization. In particular, it substantially exacerbated the protectionist biases in the international trade policies that became evident after the global financial crisis of 2008–2009. It triggered appearance of new rapidly rising actors at the international trade field such as India and Brazil. This points at major underlying shifts in the global production and supplies schemes. Basically, tensions between the two flagships of globalization produced much higher uncertainty in the global trade which, in the next decade, is unlikely to show the dynamics comparable to that of the period 2002–2008.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Дана характеристика долгосрочных трендов мировой торговли и происходящих в ней структурных изменений. Рассчитаны оценки эластичности мировой торговли по ВВП, динамики соотношения товаров и услуг, структурных сдвигов по основным странам и регионам мира, включая 2022 г. Особое внимание уделено торговле США–Китай. Сделан вывод о том, что наиболее серьезным долгосрочным последствием их торгового конфликта стало не конъюнктурное и временное падение показателей взаимной торговли, а возросшая неопределенность торговой политики и ущерб имиджу обоих государств, являющихся флагманами глобализации.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>world trade</kwd><kwd>structural shifts</kwd><kwd>elasticity of trade</kwd><kwd>ICT</kwd><kwd>aircraft</kwd><kwd>spacecraft</kwd><kwd>USA</kwd><kwd>China</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>мировая торговля</kwd><kwd>структурные сдвиги</kwd><kwd>эластичность</kwd><kwd>ИКТ</kwd><kwd>летательные и космические аппараты</kwd><kwd>США</kwd><kwd>Китай</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Arriola C., Kowalski P., van Tongeren F. The Impact of COVID‑19 on Directions and Structure of International Trade. OECD Trade Policy Papers no. 252. Paris, OECD Publishing, 2021. 41 p. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1787/0b8eaafe-en</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Kumar R. Global Value Chains and Structural Transformation: Evidence from the Developing World. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2023, vol. 66, рр. 285-299. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2023.05.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Kumar R. Global Value Chains and Structural Transformation: Evidence from the Developing World. SSRN, 2022. 33 p. Available at: http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4252613</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Constantinescu C., Mattoo A., Ruta M. The Global Trade Slowdown: Cyclical or Structural? The World Bank Economic Review, 2020, vol. 34, iss. 1, pp. 121-142. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhx027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Alessandria G. A., Johnson R. C., Yi Kei-Mu. Perspectives on Trade and Structural Transformation. NBER Working Paper 28720, April 2021. 29 р. Available at: http://doi.org/10.3386/w28720</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Fajgelbaum P., Khandelwal A. The Economic Impacts of the US-China Trade War. NBER Working Paper 29315, 2021. 28 p. Available at: http://doi.org/10.3386/w29315</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Bekkers E., Schroeter S. An Economic Analysis of the US-China Trade Conflict. WTO Working Papers no. 2020/04.36 p. Available at: http://doi.org/10.30875/5b611474-en</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Lewis L., Monarch R., Sposi M., Jing Zhang. Structural Change and Global Trade. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2022, vol. 20, iss. 1, pp. 476-512. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvab024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Dadush U. Is the Post-War Trading System Ending? Bruegel, Policy Contribution 04/2022. 12 р. Available at: https://www.bruegel.org/policy-brief/post-war-trading-system-ending (accessed 31.08.2023).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Banga K., Harbansh P., Singh S. Digital de-Industrialization, Global Value Chains, and Structural Transformation: Empirical Evidence from Low- and Middle-Income Countries. WIDER Working Paper Series wp‑2023-65. UNUWIDER, May 2023. 29 р. Available at: http://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2023/373-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Hoang V. P., Piccardi C., Tajoli L. A Network Analysis of World Trade Structural Changes (1996–2019). Cherifi H., Mantegna R. N., Rocha L. M., Cherifi C., Miccichè S., eds. Complex Networks and Their Applications XI. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2016 2022. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 2023, vol. 1077, pp. 490-501. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21127-0_40</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Al-Haschimi A., Gächter M., Lodge D., Steingress W. The Great Normalisation of Global Trade. World Commerce Review. Available at: https://www.worldcommercereview.com/publications/article_pdf/1143 (accessed 11.09.2023).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Lund S., Manyika J., Woetzel J., Bughin J., Krishnan M., Seong Jeongmin, Muir M. Globalization in Transition: The Future of Trade and Value Chains. McKinsey Global Institute, 2019. 131 р. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/innovation-and-growth/globalization-in-transition-the-future-of-trade-and-value-chains (accessed 31.08.2023).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Baldwin R. Service-export-led Development &amp; the Future of Trade. Washington, World Bank, 01.02.2023. 48 p. Available at: https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/ca24d55f8afc0550523b6921216a883e‑0350012023/related/Slides-Baldwin.pdf (accessed 31.08.2023).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Kupelian B. Will “Slowbalisation” Snowball into the Global Services Trade? PwC, 2020. 4 p. Available at: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/economy/global-economy-watch/assets/images/pwc-global-economy-watch-march‑2020.pdf (accessed 31.08.2023).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Wettstein S., Liberatore A., Magdeleine J., Maurer A. A Global Trade in Services Data Set by Sector and by Modeof Supply (TiSMoS). WTO, 2020. 46 р. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/daily_update_e/Tismos_methodology.pdf (accessed 31.08.2023).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
