Russian Journal of GeneticsRussian Journal of GeneticsГенетика0016-67583034-5103The Russian Academy of Sciences66691410.31857/S0016675823010022CLDIBUГЕНЕТИКА ЖИВОТНЫХEvidence of the Genetic Mating System in Viviparity White-Edged Rockfish, Sebastes taczanowskii Steindachner, 1880Определение генетической системы спаривания у живородящего морского окуня Sebastes taczanowskii Steindachner, 1880BatishchevaN. M.БатищеваН. М.batishchevanata@gmail.comYagodinaV. D.ЯгодинаВ. Д.batishchevanata@gmail.comBrykovV. A.БрыковВ. А.batishchevanata@gmail.comZhirmunsky National Scientific Center of Marine Biology, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesНациональный научный центр морской биологии им. А.В. Жирмунского Дальневосточного отделения Российской академии наук010120235919710526022025Copyright ©; 2023, Н.М. Батищева, В.Д. Ягодина, В.А. БрыковCopyright ©; 2023, Н.М. Батищева, В.Д. Ягодина, В.А. Брыков2023Н.М. Батищева, В.Д. Ягодина, В.А. БрыковН.М. Батищева, В.Д. Ягодина, В.А. Брыковhttps://transsyst.ru/0016-6758/article/view/666914

Internal fertilization and viviparity are characteristic of some species of the genus Sebastes. Polyandry has also been reported for some species of this genus. We used five microsatellite markers and three main statistical approaches to estimate the level of polyandry in a wild population of white-edged rockfish (Sebastes taczanowskii). In some clutches, we detected multiple paternity. This study is the first record of multiple paternity in white-edged rockfish from the Far East. Polyandry is probably quite a widespread strategy in this species inhabiting the Far Eastern seas, and also an important factor in the regulation of genetic diversity and productivity.

Внутреннее оплодотворение и живорождение характерно для некоторых видов рода Sebastes. У некоторых видов этого рода показано наличие полиандрии. Мы использовали пять микросателлитных маркеров и три основных статистических подхода для оценки уровня полиандрии в дикой популяции восточного морского окуня (Sebastes taczanowskii). В некоторых кладках нами обнаружено множественное отцовство. Настоящая работа – первое доказательство множественного отцовства у дальневосточного морского окуня. Вероятно, полиандрия является весьма распространенной стратегией у этого вида, обитающего в дальневосточных морях, а также важным фактором в регулировании генетического разнообразия и продуктивности.

reproductive strategymicrosatellitespolyandryscorpaeniformesSebastes.репродуктивная стратегиямикросателлитыполиандрияскорпенообразныеSebastes.Murua H., Saborido-Rey F. Female reproductive strategies of marine fish species of the North Atlantic // J. Northwest Atlantic Fish. Sci. 2003. V. 33. P. 23–31.DeWoody J.A., Avise J.C. Genetic perspectives on the natural history of fish mating systems // J. Heredity. 2001. V. 92(2). P. 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/92.2.167Haddeland P.J., Junge C., Serbezov D., Vøllestad L.A. Genetic parentage analysis confirms a polygynandrous breeding system in the European grayling (Thymallus thymallus) // PLoS One. 2015. V. 10(3). e0122032. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122032Ribolli J., Mino C.I., Zaniboni-Filho E. et al. Preliminary insights into the genetic mating system of Neotropical Salminus brasiliensis: Kinship assignment and parental reconstruction reveal polygynandry // Ichthyol. Research. 2016. V. 63(1). P. 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-015-0487-2Smith C., Wootton R.J. The remarkable reproductive diversity of teleost fishes // Fish and Fisheries. 2016. V. 17(4). P. 1208–1215. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12116Avise J.C., Jones A.G., Walker D. et al. Genetic mating systems and reproductive natural histories of fishes: Lessons for ecology and evolution // Annual Review Genet. 2002. V. 36(1). P. 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.36.030602.090831Karageorge K.W. Microsatellite DNA Assessment of the Genetic Mating System of the Viviparous Black Rockfish, Sebastes melanops. California State Univ., Long Beach, 2009.Nunney L. The influence of mating system and overlapping generations on effective population size // Evolution. 1993. V. 47(5). P.1329–1341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb02158.xJones A.G., Ardren W.R. Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations // Mol. Ecol. 2003. V. 12(10). P. 2511–2523. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01928.xJohansson M.L., Clifford K., Fodness B. et al. Mate selection in captive-breeding rockfishes Sebastes spp.: Inference from parentage analysis and the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) // Marine Ecol. Progress Series. 2012. V. 460. P. 195–206. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09803Love M.S., Yoklavich M., Thorsteinson L.K. The Rockfishes of the Northeast Pacific. Univ. California Press, 2002.Gray A.K., Rodgveller C.J., Lunsford C.R. Evidence of multiple paternity in quillback rockfish (Sebastes maliger) // U.S. Dep Commer. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-AFSC-303. 2015. P. 25. https://doi.org/10.7289/V5PZ56T3Sogard S.M., Gilbert-Horvath E., Anderson E.C. et al. Multiple paternity in viviparous kelp rockfish, Sebastes atrovirens // Environ. Biol. Fishes. 2008. V. 81(1). P. 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-006-9170-9Hyde J.R., Kimbrell C., Robertson L. et al. Multiple paternity and maintenance of genetic diversity in the live-bearing rockfishes Sebastes spp. // Marine Ecol. Progress Series. 2008. V. 357. P. 245–253. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07296Boehlert G.W., Yamada J. In Rockfishes of the genus Sebastes: Their reproduction and early life history // Introduction to the Symposium on Rockfishes. Springer. 1991. P. 9–14.Boehlert G.W., Yoklavich M.M. Reproduction, embryonic energetics, and the maternal-fetal relationship in the viviparous genus Sebastes (Pisces: Scorpaenidae) // Biol. Bulletin. 1984. V. 167(2). P. 354–370.Маркевич А.И. Состав группировок, экология и поведение морских окуней рода Sebastes Дальневосточного морского заповедника (залив Петра Великого, Японское море): Дис. … канд. биол. наук. Владивосток: ИБМ ДВО РАН, 1998. С. 149.Gao T., Ding K., Song N. et al. Comparative analysis of multiple paternity in different populations of viviparous black rockfish, Sebastes schlegelii, a fish with long-term female sperm storage // Marine Biodiversity. 2018. V. 48(4). P. 2017–2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-017-0713-4Gonzalez E.B., Murakami T., Teshima Y. et al. Paternity testing of wild black rockfish Sebastes inermis (brownish type) from the Seto Inland Sea of Japan // Ichthyol. Research. 2009. V. 56(1). P. 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-008-0055-0Van Doornik D.M., Parker S.J., Millard S.R. et al. Multiple paternity is prevalent in Pacific ocean perch (Sebastes alutus) off the Oregon coast, and is correlated with female size and age // Environmental Biol. Fishes. 2008. V. 83(3). P. 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-008-9331-0Karageorge K.W., Wilson R.R., Jr. An integrative mating system assessment of a nonmodel, economically important Pacific rockfish (Sebastes melanops) reveals nonterritorial polygamy and conservation implications for a large species flock // Ecol. Evol. 2017. V. 7(24). P. 11277–11291. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3579Wourms J.P. Reproduction and development of Sebastes in the context of the evolution of piscine viviparity // Environ. Biol. Fishes. 1991. V. 30(1). P. 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296882Колпаков Н.В. О биологии малого Sebastes minor и восточного S. taczanowskii (Sebastidae) морских окуней прибрежных вод северного Приморья // Вопр. ихтиологии. 2006. Т. 46. № 3. С. 334–344.Haldorson L., Love M. Maturity and fecundity in the rockfishes, Sebastes spp. // Mar. Fish. Rev. 1991. V. 53. № 2. P. 25–31.Hayakawa Y., Munehara H. Comparison of ovarian functions for keeping embryos by measurement of dissolved oxygen concentrations in ovaries of copulatory and noncopulatory oviparous fishes and viviparous fishes // J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2003. V. 295. № 2. P. 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(03)00297-1Nagasawa T., Ishida R., Sasaki M. Development of Sebastes taczanowskii (Scorpaenidae) in the Sea of Japan off Hokkaido with a key to species of larvae // Ichthyol. Res. 2008. V. 55. № 2. P. 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-007-0016-zTakahashi H., Takano K., Takemura A. Reproductive cycles of Sebastes taczanowskii, compared with those of other rockfishes of the genus Sebastes // Environ. Biol. Fishes. 1991. V. 30. № 1–2. P. 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296873Taylor M.L., Price T.A.R., Wedell N. Polyandry in nature: A global analysis // Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014. V. 29 (7). P. 376–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.04.005Borrell Y.J., Pineda H., McCarthy I. et al. Correlations between fitness and heterozygosity at allozyme and microsatellite loci in the Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. // Heredity. 2004. V. 92(6). P. 585–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.08.021Gomes M.L., Hatanaka T., de Campos W.N.,Wasko A.P. Assessing paternity in Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica) using microsatellite markers-inferences for its mating system and reproductive success // Brazil. J. Poultry Science. 2013. V. 15(4). P. 329–338.Liu J.-X., Tatarenkov A., O’Rear T.A. et al. Molecular evidence for multiple paternity in a population of the viviparous tule perch Hysterocarpus traski // J. Heredity. 2013. V. 104(2). P. 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/ess105Neff B.D., Pitcher T.E. Assessing the statistical power of genetic analyses to detect multiple mating in fishes // J. Fish Biology. 2002. V. 61(3). P. 739–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb00908.xNorris A.T., Bradley D.G., Cunningham E.P. Parentage and relatedness determination in farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) using microsatellite markers // Aquaculture. 2000. V. 182(1–2). P. 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00247-1Porta J., Porta J.M., Martínez-Rodríguez G., Alvarez M.C. Genetic structure and genetic relatedness of a hatchery stock of Senegal sole (Solea senegalensis) inferred by microsatellites // Aquaculture. 2006. V. 251(1). P. 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.05.019Sekino M., Sugaya T., Hara M., Taniguchi N. Relatedness inferred from microsatellite genotypes as a tool for broodstock management of Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus // Aquaculture. 2004. V. 233(1–4). P. 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.11.008Powell W., Machray G.C., Provan J. Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats // Trends in Plant Sci. 1996. V. 1. P. 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/1360-1385(96)86898-1Abdul-Muneer P.M. Application of microsatellite markers in conservation and fisheries management: Recent advances in population structure analysis and conservation strategies // Genet. Research Intern. 2014. V. 2014. P. e691759. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/691759Selkoe K.A., Toonen R.J. Microsatellites for ecologists: A practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers // Ecol. Letters. 2006. V. 9(5). P. 615–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00889.xBonin A., Bellemain E., Bronken Eidesen P. et al. How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies // Mol. Ecol. 2004. V. 13(11). P. 3261–3273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02346.xGuichoux E., Lagache L., Wagner S. et al. Current trends in microsatellite genotyping // Mol. Ecol. Resources. 2011. V. 11(4). P. 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03014.xHoffman J.I., Amos W. Microsatellite genotyping errors: Detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion // Mol. Ecol. 2005. V. 14(2). P. 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02419.xPompanon F., Bonin A., Bellemain E., Taberlet P. Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions // Nature Rev. Genet. 2005. V. 6(11). P. 847–859. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1707Галинская Т.В., Щепетов Д.М., Лысенков С.Н. Предубеждения о микросателлитных исследованиях и как им противостоять // Генетика. 2019. Т. 55. № 6. С. 617–632.Маркевич А.И., Гнюбкина В.П. Особенности позднего эмбрионального развития и предличинок восточного Sebastes taczanowskii и малого S. minor морских окуней (Sebastidae) в заливе Петра Великого Японского моря // Изв. ТИНРО. 2015. С. 183. https://doi.org/10.26428/1606-9919-2015-183-112-119Asahida T., Kobayashi T., Saitoh K., Nakayama I. Tissue preservation and total DNA extraction form fish stored at ambient temperature using buffers containing high concentration of urea // Fish. Science. 1996. V. 62(5). P. 727–730. https://doi.org/10.2331/fishsci.62.727Batishcheva N.M., Brykov V.A. The search of polymorphic microsatellite loci for Sebastes taczanowskii Steindachner, 1880 (Sebastidae) // Rus. J. Marine Biol. 2021. V. 47(4). P. 322–324. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063074021040027Westerman M.E., Buonaccorsi V.P., Stannard J.A. et al. Cloning and characterization of novel microsatellite DNA markers for the grass rockfish, Sebastes rastrelliger, and cross-species amplification in 10 related Sebastes spp. // Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2005. V. 5(1). P. 74–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00837.xWimberger P., Burr J., Gray A. et al. Isolation and characterization of twelve microsatellite loci for rockfish (Sebastes) // Marine Biotechnol. 1999. V. 1(3). P. 311–315.Flanagan S.P., Jones A.G. The future of parentage analysis: From microsatellites to SNPs and beyond // Mol. Ecol. 2019. V. 28(3). P. 544–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14988Jones A.G., Small C.M., Paczolt K.A., Ratterman N.L. A practical guide to methods of parentage analysis // Mol. Ecol. Resources. 2010. V. 10(1). P. 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02778.xYue G.H., Xia J.H. Practical considerations of molecular parentage analysis in fish // J. World Aquaculture Society. 2014. V. 45(2). P. 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12107Vandeputte M., Mauger S., Dupont-Nivet M. An evaluation of allowing for mismatches as a way to manage genotyping errors in parentage assignment by exclusion // Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2006. V. 6(1). P. 265–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01167.xJones A.G. GERUD 2.0: A computer program for the reconstruction of parental genotypes from half-sib progeny arrays with known or unknown parents // Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2005. V. 5(3). P. 708–711. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01029.xJones O.R., Wang J. COLONY: A program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data // Mol. Ecol. Resources. 2010. V. 10(3). P. 551–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02787.xJennions M.D., Petrie M. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits // Biol. Reviews. 2000. V. 75(1). P. 21–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0006323199005423Evans J.P., Magurran A.E. Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2000. V. 97(18). P. 10074–10076. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.180207297Neff Bryan D., Pitcher T.E. Genetic quality and sexual selection: An integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes // Mol. Ecol. 2005. V. 14(1). P. 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02395.xKonior M., Radwan J., Kolodziejczyk M. Polyandry increases offspring fecundity in the bulb mite // Evolution. 2001. V. 55(9). 1893–1896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00838.xSekino M., Takagi N., Hara M., Takahashi H. Analysis of microsatellite DNA polymorphisms in rockfish Sebastes thompsoni and application to population genetics studies // Marine Biotechnol. 2001. V. 3(1). P. 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101260000046Gomez-Uchida D., Hoffman E.A., Ardren W.R., Banks M.A. Microsatellite markers for the heavily exploited canary (Sebastes pinniger) and other rockfish species // Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2003. V. 3(3). P. 387–389. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00458.xYoshida K., Nakagawa M., Wada S. Multiplex PCR system applied for analysing microsatellite loci of Schlegel’s black rockfish, Sebastes schlegeli // Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2005. V. 5(2). P. 416–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.00945.xKarageorge K.W., Wilson R.R., Jr. An integrative mating system assessment of a nonmodel, economically important Pacific rockfish (Sebastes melanops) reveals nonterritorial polygamy and conservation implications for a large species flock // Ecol. Evol. 2017. V. 7(24). P. 11277–11291. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3579Ng W.-C., Sadovy Y., Leung F.C.C. Mating system of the rockfish, Sebastiscus marmoratus as revealed by DNA fingerprinting // Ichthyol. Research. 2003. V. 50(4). P. 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-003-0178-2Croshaw D.A., Peters M.B., Glenn T.C. Comparing the performance of analytical techniques for genetic parentage of half-sib progeny arrays // Genet. Res., Camb. 2009. V. 91. P. 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672309990231Doan Q.K., Vandeputte M., Chatain B. et al. Combining VITASSIGN and COLONY: An efficient practical procedure for parental assignment with missing parents // ISGA XII. 2015. Santiago de Compostela, Spain. hal-01535335Allal F., Doan Q.K., Chatain B. et al. Combining vitassign and colony for pedigree reconstruction in a case of factorial mating with missing parental genotypes // Aquaculture. Cutting Edge Science in Aquaculture. 2015. August 23–26. Montpellier. France.Bos D.H., Gopurenko D., Williams R.N., DeWoody J.A. Inferring population history and demography using microsatellites, mitochondrial DNA, and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes // Evolution: Intern. J. Organic Evolution. 2008. V. 62(6). P. 1458–1468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00364.x